Author summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Constance Harper results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 1,074 hits. Analysis detected 4,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (929 of 8,467 authors). This Constance Harper is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Constance Harper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠89%Constance Harper (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Constance Harper attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Constance Harper vs sitewide
Constance Harper attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos