Author summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy Ramirez results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 2,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,439 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,169 of 5,258 authors). This Cindy Ramirez is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Cindy Ramirez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠78%Cindy Ramirez (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,439
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cindy Ramirez attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cindy Ramirez vs sitewide
Cindy Ramirez attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos