Author summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video1,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Spata results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 3,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,462 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (2,328 of 4,935 authors). This Christopher Spata is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Christopher Spata
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠53%Christopher Spata (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,462
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Christopher Spata attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Christopher Spata vs sitewide
Christopher Spata attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos