Author summary
21% 1 analyzed article/video 758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina van Waasbergen results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Burden of Proof , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 169 hits . Analysis detected 1,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (5,069 of 9,486 authors). This Christina van Waasbergen is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Christina van Waasbergen
Author details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst