Author summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christen McCurdy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 2,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,043 of 8,610 authors). This Christen McCurdy is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Christen McCurdy
Author details
Total words: 4,132
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst