Author summary
20%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Gordon Cordover results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Representativeness Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 21% (6,812 of 8,567 authors). This Chloe Gordon Cordover is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Chloe Gordon Cordover
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
21%Chloe Gordon Cordover (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,604
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos