Author summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chih-Rong Kuo results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 1,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (3,663 of 6,699 authors). This Chih-Rong Kuo is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Chih-Rong Kuo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠46%Chih-Rong Kuo (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,084
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chih-Rong Kuo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chih-Rong Kuo vs sitewide
Chih-Rong Kuo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos