Author summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheyenne McNeill results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 3,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (3,853 of 9,471 authors). This Cheyenne McNeill is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Cheyenne McNeill
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠60%Cheyenne McNeill (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,604
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.4%11.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos