Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chelsea Grinstead results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This Chelsea Grinstead is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chelsea Grinstead
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Chelsea Grinstead (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos