Author summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlotte Grinberg results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 1,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (1,883 of 6,746 authors). This Charlotte Grinberg is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Charlotte Grinberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠73%Charlotte Grinberg (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,168
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Charlotte Grinberg attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Charlotte Grinberg vs sitewide
Charlotte Grinberg attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos