Author summary
ā 84%1 analyzed article/video906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Pulliam-Moore results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 854 hits. Analysis detected 3,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,718 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ā 87% (777 of 5,945 authors). This Charles Pulliam-Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Charles Pulliam-Moore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 87%Charles Pulliam-Moore (selected)7%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,718
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Charles Pulliam-Moore attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Charles Pulliam-Moore vs sitewide
Charles Pulliam-Moore attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos