Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles D. Perry results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 438 hits . Analysis detected 1,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,847 of 8,784 authors). This Charles D. Perry is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Charles D. Perry
Author details
Total words: 3,236
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst