Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Champe Barton results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 484 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,150 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,792 authors). This Champe Barton is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Champe Barton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Champe Barton (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,150
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Champe Barton attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Champe Barton vs sitewide
Champe Barton attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos