Author summary
97%1 analyzed article/video1,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Rikap results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 658 hits. Analysis detected 2,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,398 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (763 of 4,675 authors). This Cecilia Rikap is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Cecilia Rikap
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cecilia Rikap attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cecilia Rikap vs All Other Publications
Cecilia Rikap attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.