Author summary
97%1 analyzed article/video1,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Rikap results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 658 hits. Analysis detected 2,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,398 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (763 of 4,675 authors). This Cecilia Rikap is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Cecilia Rikap
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
0%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
1%Joe Rennison1%
1%Jason Karaian1%
84%Cecilia Rikap (selected)6%
100%Daniel Arkin38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,398
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cecilia Rikap attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cecilia Rikap vs All Other Publications
Cecilia Rikap attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos