Author summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cat Rainsford results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 1,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,411 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (4,955 of 6,278 authors). This Cat Rainsford is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Cat Rainsford
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠22%Cat Rainsford (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,411
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cat Rainsford attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cat Rainsford vs sitewide
Cat Rainsford attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos