Author summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Drew results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 455 faulty-reasoning hits from 957 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (2,469 of 5,949 authors). This Caroline Drew is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Caroline Drew
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠59%Caroline Drew (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 957
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Caroline Drew attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Caroline Drew vs sitewide
Caroline Drew attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos