Author summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Carmen Russell-Sluchansky results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 196 faulty-reasoning hits from 644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 8,907 authors). This Carmen Russell-Sluchansky is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Carmen Russell-Sluchansky
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
ā 0%Carmen Russell-Sluchansky (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 644
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles644 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.5%13.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 8.1%8.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 3.3%3.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos