Author summary
2%1 analyzed article/video499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CalMatters Staff results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 369 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,497 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (3,619 of 4,927 authors). This CalMatters Staff is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
CalMatters Staff
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
CalMatters Staff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
CalMatters Staff vs sitewide
CalMatters Staff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.