Author summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video1,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Calista Oetama results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 2,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (5,323 of 6,070 authors). This Calista Oetama is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Calista Oetama
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠13%Calista Oetama (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,016
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Calista Oetama attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Calista Oetama vs sitewide
Calista Oetama attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos