Author summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burgess Everett results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 2,375 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (2,292 of 4,972 authors). This Burgess Everett is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Burgess Everett
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠54%Burgess Everett (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,680
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Burgess Everett attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Burgess Everett vs sitewide
Burgess Everett attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos