Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Branden D. Elmore results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 458 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,782 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This Branden D. Elmore is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Branden D. Elmore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Branden D. Elmore (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,782
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos