Author summary
32%1 analyzed article/video6,986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attila Tomaschek results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 1,131 hits. Analysis detected 10,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,688 of 8,804 authors). This Attila Tomaschek is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Attila Tomaschek
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
24%Attila Tomaschek (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,958
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510024.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles21K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos