Author summary
3%1 analyzed article/video1,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anya van Wagtendonk results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Quote-first Misdirection, and Negativity Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 2.3% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (9,269 of 9,424 authors). This Anya van Wagtendonk is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Anya van Wagtendonk
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
2%Anya van Wagtendonk (selected)1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,492
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos