Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antonia Noori Farzan results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (2,473 of 9,468 authors). This Antonia Noori Farzan is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Antonia Noori Farzan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠74%Antonia Noori Farzan (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,016
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos