Author summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video3,723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony F. Pipa results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 973 hits. Analysis detected 6,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (4,696 of 5,024 authors). This Anthony F. Pipa is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Anthony F. Pipa
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠7%Anthony F. Pipa (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,892
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Anthony F. Pipa attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Anthony F. Pipa vs sitewide
Anthony F. Pipa attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos