Author summary
21% 1 analyzed article/video 938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annie Sciacca results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 223 hits . Analysis detected 1,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 21% (6,796 of 8,520 authors). This Annie Sciacca is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Annie Sciacca
Author details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst