Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Anna Kaminski results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 866 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This Anna Kaminski is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Anna Kaminski
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Anna Kaminski (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 866
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles866 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 5.1%5.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos