Author summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 1,214 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Schimke results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 412 hits . Analysis detected 1,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,980 of 9,283 authors). This Ann Schimke is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Ann Schimke
Author details
Total words: 4,856
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Straw Man: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst