Author summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Weber results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (1,931 of 5,314 authors). This Andrew Weber is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Andrew Weber
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠64%Andrew Weber (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,515
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Andrew Weber attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Andrew Weber vs sitewide
Andrew Weber attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos