Author summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video1,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Scobell results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 1,084 hits. Analysis detected 6,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,077 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,329 of 5,682 authors). This Andrew Scobell is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Andrew Scobell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠77%Andrew Scobell (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,077
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Andrew Scobell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Andrew Scobell vs sitewide
Andrew Scobell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos