Author summary
72%1 analyzed article/video615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Hammel results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 1,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,845 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,339 of 9,471 authors). This Andrew Hammel is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Andrew Hammel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
86%Andrew Hammel (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,845
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.5%11.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Tip of the Iceberg47%
Quillette61%By Andrew Hammel72%8/7/2026, 2:34:06 PM