Author summary
18%2 analyzed articles/videos384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anastasia Mason results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 858 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,556 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,770 of 8,575 authors). This Anastasia Mason is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Anastasia Mason
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
45%Anastasia Mason (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,556
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos