Author summary
35%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Ceballos Los Angeles Times results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 1,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,625 of 9,471 authors). This Ana Ceballos Los Angeles Times is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Ana Ceballos Los Angeles Times
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
62%Ana Ceballos Los Angeles Times (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,372
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.9%2.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 5.1%5.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos