Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Ceballos Los Angeles Times results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 174 hits . Analysis detected 1,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,625 of 9,471 authors). This Ana Ceballos Los Angeles Times is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Ana Ceballos Los Angeles Times
Author details
Total words: 2,372
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst