Author summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Yeo results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 765 faulty-reasoning hits from 774 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (783 of 6,482 authors). This Amanda Yeo is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Amanda Yeo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠88%Amanda Yeo (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 774
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Amanda Yeo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Amanda Yeo vs sitewide
Amanda Yeo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos