Author summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Watford results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 1,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (1,992 of 5,694 authors). This Amanda Watford is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Amanda Watford
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠65%Amanda Watford (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,106
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Amanda Watford attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Amanda Watford vs sitewide
Amanda Watford attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos