Author summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video1,505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AMANDA SWINHART results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 3,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (3,962 of 5,239 authors). This AMANDA SWINHART is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
AMANDA SWINHART
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠25%AMANDA SWINHART (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
AMANDA SWINHART attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
AMANDA SWINHART vs sitewide
AMANDA SWINHART attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos