Author summary
89%1 analyzed article/video211 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Quintana results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 829 faulty-reasoning hits from 844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (884 of 8,637 authors). This Amanda Quintana is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Amanda Quintana
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
90%Amanda Quintana (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 844
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles844 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 19.1%19.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.6%14.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 5.8%5.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Author 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 19.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos