Author summary
ā 67%1 analyzed article/video510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Pike results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ā 73% (1,422 of 5,133 authors). This Amanda Pike is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Amanda Pike
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 1%Joe Rennison1%
ā 73%Amanda Pike (selected)4%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,040
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Amanda Pike attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Amanda Pike vs sitewide
Amanda Pike attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos