Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Amanda Paule results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 4,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 5,315 authors). This Amanda Paule is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Amanda Paule
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Amanda Paule (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,602
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Amanda Paule attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Amanda Paule vs sitewide
Amanda Paule attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos