Author summary
ā 5%1 analyzed article/video792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Eggert results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Recency Bias, and Anecdotal, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.3% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 485 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ā 9% (7,533 of 8,281 authors). This Amanda Eggert is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Amanda Eggert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 0%Cleveland Documenters1%
ā 9%Amanda Eggert (selected)2%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,168
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Amanda Eggert attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Amanda Eggert vs sitewide
Amanda Eggert attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos