Author summary
100% 2 analyzed articles/videos 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Chatel results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anchoring Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 79.9% saturation with 1,473 hits . Analysis detected 3,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of 97% (320 of 8,706 authors). This Amanda Chatel is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group. Amanda Chatel
Author details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.3% percentile 10.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 79.9% 79.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.9% 22.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 20.2% 20.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.1% 7.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 79.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst