Author summary
46%1 analyzed article/video976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alycia Kamil results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 1,942 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,099 of 8,773 authors). This Alycia Kamil is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Alycia Kamil
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
54%Alycia Kamil (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,904
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos