Author summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos1,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alliance to Protect Delaware’s Future results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,490 hits. Analysis detected 8,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (4,104 of 8,276 authors). This Alliance to Protect Delaware’s Future is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Alliance to Protect Delaware’s Future
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠51%Alliance to Protect Delaware’s Future (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,768
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Alliance to Protect Delaware’s Future attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Alliance to Protect Delaware’s Future vs sitewide
Alliance to Protect Delaware’s Future attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos