Author summary
55%1 analyzed article/video1,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aidan Stretch results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 2,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,541 of 8,522 authors). This Aidan Stretch is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Aidan Stretch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
35%Aidan Stretch (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,108
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos