Author summary
65%1 analyzed article/video703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrianne Murchison results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 938 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,109 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,985 of 9,471 authors). This Adrianne Murchison is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Adrianne Murchison
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
58%Adrianne Murchison (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,109
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos