Author summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Ashford results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,620 of 5,682 authors). This Adrian Ashford is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Adrian Ashford
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠72%Adrian Ashford (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Adrian Ashford attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Adrian Ashford vs sitewide
Adrian Ashford attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos