BS Summary: These Adam Sennott results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 2,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (3,134 of 4,520 authors). This Adam Sennott is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Adam Sennott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠31%Adam Sennott (selected)3%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 3,352
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Adam Sennott attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Adam Sennott vs All Other Publications
Adam Sennott attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.