Author summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Marcus results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 645 hits. Analysis detected 3,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (3,287 of 8,317 authors). This Adam Marcus is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Adam Marcus
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠61%Adam Marcus (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,728
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Adam Marcus attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Adam Marcus vs sitewide
Adam Marcus attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos