Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Adam Benson results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 292 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,034 authors). This Adam Benson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Adam Benson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Adam Benson (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,106
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos