Author summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Van Buren results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,830 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (2,126 of 5,829 authors). This Abigail Van Buren is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Abigail Van Buren
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠64%Abigail Van Buren (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,830
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Abigail Van Buren attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Abigail Van Buren vs sitewide
Abigail Van Buren attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos